Day Hospital Compliance and Accreditation Overhaul
Achieving full accreditation for a day hospital after multiple non-conformities

The Problem
Failed initial accreditation attempt with 12 non-conformities
Our Approach
Comprehensive gap analysis, policy rewrite, staff training program
The Outcomes
Achieved full accreditation with zero non-conformities on re-assessment
Key Results
12 of 12
Non-Conformities Resolved
Full Accreditation
Re-Assessment Result
5 months
Time to Accreditation
34
Policies Rewritten
The Challenge
This privately operated day hospital in Perth, Western Australia, provides surgical and procedural services across ophthalmology, gastroenterology, orthopaedic, and cosmetic surgery disciplines. The facility has four procedure rooms, a 12-bed recovery area, and employs approximately 35 clinical and administrative staff including registered nurses, enrolled nurses, anaesthetic technicians, and support personnel. The facility manages approximately 3,500 procedures annually.
The day hospital had undergone its initial accreditation assessment against the National Safety and Quality Health Service (NSQHS) Standards (second edition) and received a report identifying 12 non-conformities — an unusually high number that placed the facility's accreditation status in serious jeopardy. The facility was given a limited timeframe to address the findings and present for re-assessment.
The non-conformities spanned multiple NSQHS Standards and reflected systemic gaps in the facility's governance, clinical processes, and documentation. The 12 findings included:
- Clinical Governance Standard: No documented clinical governance framework, absence of a formal credentialing and scope of clinical practice process for visiting medical officers (VMOs), and inadequate systems for clinical performance monitoring
- Partnering with Consumers Standard: No evidence of consumer engagement in service planning or quality improvement activities, and patient information materials had not been reviewed with consumer input
- Preventing and Controlling Healthcare-Associated Infection Standard: Infection control policies were outdated, hand hygiene audit data was not being collected systematically, and sterilisation processes lacked documented validation records
- Medication Safety Standard: No standardised medication reconciliation process for day surgery patients, antimicrobial stewardship activities were not documented, and high-risk medication management protocols were incomplete
- Comprehensive Care Standard: Deteriorating patient identification and escalation processes were not formally documented or consistently applied across all clinical areas
- Communicating for Safety Standard: Clinical handover between procedure rooms and recovery was inconsistent, and there was no structured handover tool in use
The facility's leadership recognised they did not have the internal expertise to address all 12 non-conformities within the required timeframe and engaged Complete Health Partners to lead the remediation program.
Our Approach
We deployed a dedicated project team comprising a senior healthcare accreditation consultant, a clinical governance specialist, and an infection prevention and control advisor. The engagement was structured as an intensive five-month program with clear milestones aligned to the re-assessment date.
Phase 1: Detailed Gap Analysis and Prioritisation (Weeks 1-2)
Our first step was to conduct a thorough independent assessment of the facility against all eight NSQHS Standards, going beyond the 12 identified non-conformities to uncover any additional gaps that could present risks at re-assessment.
This analysis identified a further 8 areas of concern that, while not formally raised as non-conformities, were at risk of being flagged during re-assessment. We developed a prioritised remediation plan covering all 20 areas, grouped by standard and sequenced by complexity and lead time.
Each item in the remediation plan was assigned a responsible person from the facility's team, a target completion date, and defined evidence requirements for demonstrating compliance at re-assessment.
Phase 2: Policy and Procedure Rewrite (Weeks 3-8)
The gap analysis revealed that many of the facility's existing policies and procedures were either outdated, incomplete, or did not reflect current practice. We undertook a comprehensive policy rewrite covering 34 documents across the following areas:
- Clinical governance framework: We developed a complete clinical governance framework document for the facility, including governance structure, committee terms of reference, reporting lines, and key performance indicators. This included a credentialing and scope of clinical practice policy and associated processes for all VMOs.
- Infection prevention and control suite: We rewrote the facility's infection control manual, including hand hygiene policy, standard and transmission-based precautions, environmental cleaning schedules, sterilisation and reprocessing procedures, and outbreak management plan. Critically, we also established the audit and surveillance systems needed to demonstrate ongoing compliance.
- Medication safety policies: We developed a medication reconciliation procedure for day surgery patients, an antimicrobial stewardship policy, high-risk medication protocols, and medication incident reporting procedures.
- Clinical care policies: We developed a deteriorating patient recognition and response system using a standardised early warning score tool appropriate for the day surgery setting, structured clinical handover procedures using the ISBAR framework, and comprehensive care planning documentation.
- Consumer engagement framework: We developed a consumer partnership strategy including consumer representation on the facility's quality committee, patient feedback mechanisms, and a process for consumer review of patient information materials.
All policies were developed in consultation with the facility's clinical leadership and key staff to ensure they were practical, implementable, and reflected the realities of the facility's operations.
Phase 3: Systems Implementation (Weeks 6-14)
Policy documents alone do not achieve accreditation compliance — the facility needed to demonstrate that systems were implemented and functioning. We supported the implementation of:
- Clinical governance meetings: We established a monthly clinical governance committee meeting with a standardised agenda, attendance register, action log, and reporting template. We attended the first three meetings to coach the committee chair and members.
- Credentialing process: We facilitated the credentialing of all VMOs against the new policy, including collection of qualifications, registration verification, insurance confirmations, and scope of clinical practice agreements. This process involved direct engagement with each of the facility's 11 VMOs.
- Hand hygiene audit program: We trained designated staff as hand hygiene auditors using the Hand Hygiene Australia methodology, established an audit schedule, and implemented a data collection and reporting system.
- Medication reconciliation workflow: We embedded the new medication reconciliation process into the pre-admission and day-of-surgery workflows, including documentation templates and staff role assignments.
- Deteriorating patient system: We implemented the early warning score tool, trained all clinical staff in its use, and conducted escalation drills to test the response pathway.
- Clinical handover: We implemented ISBAR-based handover between procedure rooms and recovery, including a structured handover checklist and observation audits to verify compliance.
Phase 4: Staff Training (Weeks 8-16)
We delivered a targeted training program to all 35 staff members, structured by role:
- All staff (two-hour mandatory session): NSQHS Standards overview, the facility's new clinical governance framework, incident reporting, open disclosure, consumer engagement, and their individual responsibilities under the accreditation standards.
- Registered and enrolled nurses (four-hour clinical session): Deteriorating patient recognition and escalation, medication safety procedures including reconciliation, infection prevention and control updates, and clinical handover using ISBAR.
- Administrative and reception staff (90-minute session): Patient identification verification, consent processes, consumer feedback collection, and complaints management.
- VMOs (individual briefing sessions): Credentialing outcomes, scope of clinical practice documentation, and their responsibilities under the clinical governance framework.
Training attendance was documented, and competency assessments were conducted for clinical staff on key procedures.
Phase 5: Mock Assessment and Final Preparation (Weeks 16-20)
Four weeks before the scheduled re-assessment, we conducted a full mock assessment simulating the accreditation surveyor methodology. The mock assessment was conducted by a senior consultant who had not been involved in the remediation work, providing an independent perspective.
The mock assessment identified three areas requiring minor adjustments — primarily around the completeness of evidence files and the consistency of documentation across clinical areas. These were addressed in the final two weeks before re-assessment.
We prepared the facility's assessment evidence portfolio, organised by NSQHS Standard, with indexed evidence folders containing all policies, audit data, meeting minutes, training records, and implementation evidence.
The Results
The facility underwent re-assessment by the accrediting body and achieved full accreditation with zero non-conformities — a complete turnaround from the 12 non-conformities identified in the initial assessment.
Key outcomes of the engagement:
- All 12 non-conformities resolved: Each of the original findings was addressed with documented evidence of sustained compliance
- Full accreditation achieved: The facility received full accreditation status with no conditions or recommendations requiring follow-up
- 34 policies rewritten: The facility now has a complete, current, and implementable policy suite aligned to the NSQHS Standards
- 5-month turnaround: The entire remediation was completed within the timeframe required by the accrediting body
- Ongoing governance capability: The clinical governance framework, committee structure, and audit programs established during the engagement continue to operate, providing the facility with an ongoing compliance monitoring capability
- Staff confidence: Post-engagement survey results indicated that staff reported significantly improved understanding of accreditation requirements and confidence in the facility's compliance systems
The facility's director noted that beyond achieving accreditation, the engagement fundamentally improved the way the facility operates. The governance structures, clinical systems, and quality processes established during the remediation are now embedded in the facility's day-to-day operations, providing a foundation for sustained compliance through future accreditation cycles.
“After failing our first accreditation attempt, we were genuinely worried about the future of the facility. CHP came in, gave us a clear plan, and worked alongside our team until we got across the line. The result speaks for itself.”
Facility Director
Day Hospital, Perth
Services Used
Want results like these?
Let's discuss how we can help your practice achieve measurable improvements in revenue, compliance, and operations.
